Grant ousted at Chelsea- An Opinion

26 05 2008

So, the predictable has happened as Avram Grant paid for a trophyless campaign with his job as manager of Chelsea. The Blues sacked their boss on Saturday after just eight months in charge of the club, and only three days after their penalty shoot-out heartbreak against Manchester United in the Champions League.

Grant arrived at Chelsea last summer from Premier League rivals Portsmouth as director of football, a move which did not please then Blues boss Jose Mourinho. After an indifferent start to the season, the popular and media pleasing Mourinho was axed after a 1-1 home draw with Rosenborg in the Champions League, and the Stamford Bridge hierarchy placed Grant in charge.

It was a decision which didn’t go down well with the fans as, not only did they adore Mourinho, the self styled “special one” who brought the club 2 league titles, they were rightly concerned at Grant’s limited managerial experience.

His first game was a daunting trip to Old Trafford and a 2-0 defeat by Manchester United wasn’t the perfect start, though they weren’t helped by the red card issued to midfielder Jon-Obi Mikel. After that though, Chelsea embarked on a 16 game unbeaten run which saw them through to the last 16 of the Champions League, quarter final of the Carling Cup and back up the Premier League table.

Although his public demeanour was perhaps duller than Mourinho’s was, he set Chelsea out to play in a more attacking sense than Mourinho did, who focused on a solid defence. This was evident in a 6-0 drubbing of Manchester City, who were then flying in 3rd place, and the 3-2 defeat of Liverpool in the second leg of the Champions League semi final. Added to that thrilling 4-4 draws with Aston Villa and Tottenham then the entertainment value was there. Certainly more so for a neutral than what Mourinho’s sides produced.

But, ultimately, Mourinho’s teams won trophies, which is where the Israeli failed. He came in for fierce criticism following the Carling Cup final loss to Tottenham, who dominated Chelsea for long periods. Then his team suffered the embarassment of FA Cup defeat at Barnsley, who had also shocked Liverpool.

Crucial dropped points in draws at home to the likes of Wigan and Everton, where Chelsea lost very late goals, ultimately cost them the title but from a seemingly impossible position which I stated after that Wigan game, they defeated Manchester United and took the title race down to the last day and marched to their first Champions League final. But Chelsea missed out on both, leaving them with nothing to show for their efforts.

Chelsea chairman Bruce Buck said in the aftermath of Grant’s departure: “We have very high expectations at Chelsea and a couple of second place finishes is just not good enough for us.

“So although it was an excellent season, we are still disappointed.”

Now, of course they are entitled to be disappointed. However, this is where football as we know it is going down the swanny in front of us. Chelsea before Roman Abramovich took over were a decent side. Regular qualifiers for Europe, winning the occasional trophy. But since the Russian has invested an obscene amount, they demand instant success. They have had some, but even reaching the final of Europe’s elite tournament and almost snatching the title from the dead isn’t good enough.

I felt its been a great season for Chelsea in the main and they were unlucky to end empty handed, especially in Moscow. Grant was given a near impossible task in trying to emulate the success of Mourinho, and I feel his sacking is premature and harsh after his achievements this season. He at least deserved to put his own stamp on them and take them into next season.

The foreign owners taking over at Premier League clubs and demanding success instantly is a problem. They don’t know too much about the game it seems to me, they’ll just think they can throw money at it and they’ll get what they want. Thaskin Shinawatra at Manchester City, threating to sack Sven-Goran Eriksson after his first season there, where they finished a very creditable 9th, is another case in point. It’s absolutely ridiculous.

I’ve said it before and will do again. Manchester United and Arsenal didn’t achieve the success they have by hiring and firing all the time. Sir Alex Ferguson has been in charge of United since 1986, and Arsene Wenger at Arsenal since 1996. Sure, they have gone through trophyless seasons but the United and Arsenal boardrooms know what great managers they are and always have faith in them.

If the Chelsea board had done that, then perhaps Grant could’ve delivered trophies next term. 8 months is not time enough to judge, and certainly not given he led Chelsea to their first Champions League final, ultimately decided on a lottery. Even axing Mourinho, after the success he’d brought was ridiculous simply because they’d had a sticky start to the season.

I feel he can leave with his head held high. The question for Chelsea is, who next? Frank Rijkaard seems to be the bookies choice, but we shall have to wait and see what happens.


Actions

Information

7 responses to “Grant ousted at Chelsea- An Opinion”

27 05 2008
adam couper (08:38:24) :

yeah interesting stuff. Grant did do a good job and was extremelly unlucky with injuries. He had to play sections of the season without John Terry, Ricardo Carvalho and Frank Lampard. 3 players who are crucial to chelseas success. also peter cech suffered an injury so it is a shame that he has not been given another year in charge. they should have won in moscow and if it werent for those pesky lactics they would have won the league.

He got the best out of the kaiser (no not Zaliuskas) but big mikky B, a player who underperformed under mourinho. It was mourinhos squad as well with the exception of anelka who ironically missed the crucial penalty who had the scum the champs league.

I mean anyone who can take the title race down to the final day, reach the carling cup final and and champs league final with players like soleman kalou, malouda, tal ben haim and paulo ferrera deserves respect.

Avram in sack the board.

Incidentently id like to see sparky get the job.

27 05 2008
Fraser Mitchell (09:05:47) :

Unfortunately it was on the cards whatever happened in the final I think. He may have waited slightly longer or even moved him upstairs but he was going to go without a doubt. The Chelsea board like the Man City board need to realise as you say that success comes with stability. It will be interesting to see who gets the job - Deschamps is being mentioned but Hiddink has ruled himself out. Other names such as Rijkaard and Erkisson have been mentioned. There would be a certain irony there I think. Rijkaard has just been sacked from Barca as they haven’t won anything this season and he has spent a lot more money and had a lot longer than to use it than Grant, whilst Eriksson is considered not good enough by the Man City board and they haven’t won anything for years….

27 05 2008
hartypar (09:53:09) :

Aye the injuries to Lampard, Terry and Drogba didn’t help him. That’s like United losing Ferdinand, Ronaldo and Rooney- they’d have struggled to cope big time. He was on a hiding to nothing when he took over and I felt he deserved another go at it next season.

Yup, the irony would be immense if Eriksson or Rijkaard got the job. I was delighted Barca decided to let him go- had done a good job, but this season and last were a bit of a disaster domestically.

I also heard that City would be interested in Grant if they get rid of Sven, interesting times ahead me thinks…….

If I were Hughes, I’d stick around at Blackburn as, IMO, he would be a strong candidate for Man Utd when Fergie decides to retire.

27 05 2008
Loon (14:50:50) :

Don’t think he deserved it but hardly a surprise. It’s what happens when those that don’t understand football are in charge.

Sparky could be a Man Utd contender but I’m worried about the prospect of it being Moyes who goes to Old Trafford

27 05 2008
hartypar (17:03:04) :

Yup, Moyes for United worries me too. I feel that the Everton board have to back him this summer if we want to progress to the next level, aka trophies and trying to break the top 4. If he doesn’t get that support, I’m worried he’ll become fed up.

27 05 2008
adamcouper (17:21:15) :

Incidently yakedy yak will not be pleased if davie leaves. I think moyes is building a good squad and he enjoys the challenge. he’s got a good team and i cant see him leaving any time soon even though it is united. he has invsted alot of time and will want to earn the right to be in the top four, not just be handed it.

Incidentally i am second when i type my blog name into google. Very exciting!

27 05 2008
hartypar (23:20:16) :

I hope so. Moyes will show a great deal of loyalty to Everton, and I’m sure the board will back him in the summer. Regardless of the rights or wrongs of it, the Kirkby stadium will help provide finance to enable them to compete with the big guns.

Incidentally, that is exciting! If you type “Dunfermline Athletic”, my blog appears on page four! Wow!

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>